tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8695598.post1275720243478374877..comments2023-12-17T19:35:07.459-08:00Comments on Bouphonia: A Problem On Our HandsPhilahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15849261651028725772noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8695598.post-1018630677732120162009-03-05T20:02:00.000-08:002009-03-05T20:02:00.000-08:00Thanks, guys.I'm glad I posted something that made...Thanks, guys.<BR/><BR/>I'm glad I posted something that made some sort of sense, instead of going off on a rant.Jazzbumpahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07337490817307473659noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8695598.post-84532871594456625942009-03-05T19:40:00.000-08:002009-03-05T19:40:00.000-08:00No worries, mate.No worries, mate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8695598.post-34775413726137892162009-03-05T13:54:00.000-08:002009-03-05T13:54:00.000-08:00Though your cryptic message really didn't clarify ...<I>Though your cryptic message really didn't clarify anything in your position other than disgust.</I><BR/><BR/>True, but that happens to the best of us.<BR/><BR/>Dan and I are old friends, so he knows I'll know what he means.<BR/><BR/>At the same time, I understand very well how reading too much right-wing babble can make it hard to interpret comments that lack context. That happens to the best of us too!<BR/><BR/>No harm done, I'm sure.Philahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15849261651028725772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8695598.post-69959295250829971872009-03-05T08:10:00.000-08:002009-03-05T08:10:00.000-08:00Oh.Well, in that case, sorry Dan, and this time I ...Oh.<BR/><BR/>Well, in that case, sorry Dan, and this time I mean it.<BR/><BR/>Though your cryptic message really didn't clarify anything in your position other than disgust.<BR/><BR/>And, speaking of totally missing the point, I've been reading too much right-wingery, and viewed Dan's comment through the wrong filter.<BR/><BR/>Lo sientoJazzbumpahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07337490817307473659noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8695598.post-51772812945587894212009-03-04T22:13:00.000-08:002009-03-04T22:13:00.000-08:00But, monsters would only be involved if someone in...<I>But, monsters would only be involved if someone in an unequal power relationship with these girls were coercing them in some way.</I><BR/><BR/>I think Dan's referring to Gallagher herself....Philahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15849261651028725772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8695598.post-37006411454063677612009-03-04T19:49:00.000-08:002009-03-04T19:49:00.000-08:00In 31 states the age of consent is 16. In another...In 31 states the age of consent is 16. In another 6 states it is 14 or 15. Of these 37, 9 have a provision raising a girls age of consent to 18 if the male is 21 or older.<BR/><BR/>There are no males over 21 in the described situation. It does take place in Pennsylvania, where the age of consent is 16. The girls who produced the photographs should either have waited a year or two, or high-tailed it down the road to South Carolina. Then again, the issue is pictures here, not any actual touching.<BR/><BR/>So, sorry, Dan. These are not children. Teenagers will be teenagers, and technology offers them new ways to display foolishness and bad judgment, that can very likely stay with them forever. <BR/><BR/>But, monsters would only be involved if someone in an unequal power relationship with these girls were coercing them in some way. Oh - and you might want to recheck the meaning of judgmental.<BR/><BR/>Also, you seem to have totally missed the point of the article.<BR/><BR/>WV: barit - you can't make this stuff up.Jazzbumpahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07337490817307473659noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8695598.post-46375644017095074572009-03-04T13:22:00.000-08:002009-03-04T13:22:00.000-08:00Right now we have a decision to make: Is underage ...<I>Right now we have a decision to make: Is underage porn (these aren't really children) a crime or not?</I><BR/><BR/>"aren't really children?" Fucking judgmental monster. That's just sick.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8695598.post-29598332055104472882009-03-04T05:29:00.000-08:002009-03-04T05:29:00.000-08:00Illustrating my point about the unlikelihood of ra...Illustrating my point about the unlikelihood of rational, principled conservatism. Also illustrating the inherent evil of people, and hence the need for shame as punishment.<BR/><BR/>Could this be the beginning of the show trials Anonymous predicted a couple of posts back?Jazzbumpahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07337490817307473659noreply@blogger.com