tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8695598.post111205339027083664..comments2023-12-17T19:35:07.459-08:00Comments on Bouphonia: Flaws IllustratedPhilahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15849261651028725772noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8695598.post-1112376434547240492005-04-01T09:27:00.000-08:002005-04-01T09:27:00.000-08:00It makes you wonder what we'd learn if we consider...<EM>It makes you wonder what we'd learn if we considered our problems honestly, and studied them scientifically.</EM><BR/><BR/>It makes you wonder, indeed. The environmental problems won't be studied honestly any time soon. Frankly, it's just getting harder and harder to take in the scope of the dishonesty. It's overwhelming. Environmental science, as it comes out of the EPA is so degraded, that it hardly deserves consideration. Why even do it? How do they find so many dishonorable people to do their dirty work?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8695598.post-1112226657699781312005-03-30T15:50:00.000-08:002005-03-30T15:50:00.000-08:00The EPA under Bush is a nightmare, no doubt about ...The EPA under Bush is a nightmare, no doubt about it. But if you read the article in question, you'll see that the initial research was conducted in the nineties, and the final report is from 2000. In other words, the system that generated this flawed report is the system that Bush is making <I>worse</I>. Sad to say, my post refers to the EPA when the "good guys" were in charge.Philahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15849261651028725772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8695598.post-1112225884612927892005-03-30T15:38:00.000-08:002005-03-30T15:38:00.000-08:00That's the new Bush EPA for ya. Less clean, more g...That's the new Bush EPA for ya. Less clean, more green ($$$) for industry. I just love it how they give their legislation such misleading Orwellian names. The "clear skies initiative" will allow polluters to set their own standards. Would you let pirates write anti-theft laws?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com